asiaone
Diva
updated 9 Jan 2010, 19:06
    Powered by rednano.sg
user id password
Sat, Jan 09, 2010
The Sunday Times
EmailPrintDecrease text sizeIncrease text size
All that fuss over a man's job
by Liam O'Brien

I have discovered that being male and not the main breadwinner in a family is something of a rarity in Singapore, where I suspect husbands are regarded as the chief income earners, and more conservative views of gender roles tend to prevail.

In my situation, the position of being the junior earner is down to the simple fact that investment bankers tend to get paid more than humble hacks.

And the net salary and benefit package my wife was offered to relocate from London to Singapore was too good to turn down.

As a married couple, it was a simple maths exercise that her career should take precedence over mine.

While this state of affairs might not be something that Singaporean men would identify with, I have discovered that my situation is pretty common within the Caucasian expat community here. I have lost count of the number of wives we have encountered here holding down the main job, with their husbands left to work in less well-paid jobs - or with no work at all.

Many women in Europe are now in jobs that they loath to give up.

They have moved up the greasy pole and accrued better pay and benefits along the way, so the cost of becoming a housewife is much greater than had they been working in the sort of clerical or secretarial job that used to be more common for women 20 or 30 years ago.

My own job involves working through the evening, so some of my days are taken up looking after our three-year-old son. (At other times, our maid takes over.) Such childcare usually involves cycling trips, visits to the zoo, museums, East Coast Park, Sentosa and the shopping malls.

On such excursions, I find the reactions of people here very different from the ones I am used to back home.

In London, no one would bat an eyelid to see a man feeding a three-year-old in a restaurant or changing a nappy (something, thankfully, my son grew out of a long time ago), but here you can't help but notice the bemused look on the faces of some Singaporeans, both male and female.

The question running through their minds must obviously be, 'Where is the mum or the maid?'

While it must seem a strange role reversal for Singaporeans, I am sure it must appear really bizarre for the foreign domestic maids when they see what they must presume to be the chief income earner of the family pushing a pram or playing with a child during a weekday.

The look on the faces of the maids I encounter is one of puzzlement, and even a little job demarcation pique that a man should be looking after a young boy - a job, they obviously think, rather quaintly, should be undertaken only by the mum or the maid.

On one occasion, I was even approached by a helper in a shopping centre who said that she knew of a maid looking for employment and volunteered her telephone number to me. When I explained that we already had a maid and, wherever possible, we preferred for our son to spend time with his parents, she looked even more perplexed.

Childcare as 'adult recreation' rather than 'chore' was something, apparently, that had never occurred to her.

The attitude that has men as the breadwinners and not the child carers in any shape or form has long gone out the window in Europe, where the luxury of having a maid is reserved for millionaires (given the relatively high minimum wage rate there).

There, men can find that their wives' careers outpace their own and, because the grandparents may live hundreds of miles away, they are forced to do a lot of the running around and childcare that traditionally would be done by the woman.

So, please, if on a Monday morning you see a Caucasian father calming a crying toddler in the supermarket, attending playgroup, or feeding junior in McDonald's, have a thought for the circumstances that have led him to his not-universally-envied predicament.

The writer, who is English, is a Straits Times copy editor. He has lived in Singapore for 19 months with his wife and their three-year-old child, Alex.

This article was first published in The Sunday Times.

readers' comments
Life use to be simpler...a guy is a guy... a gal is a gal.. anything in between or mix ..be it physical behaviour or role play is not acceptable by the then society...yes then there might be some tragedy due to the unacceptable behaviour..but the general society is quite stable...Now we fight for gay right, lesbian right, woman right, children right, human right, any rights...and things are getting more and more complicated as the society "progress" economically and intellectually and less and less physcially...we have bring the sparing from physical arena to intellectual arena...or are we regressing...generally whoever has more/increasing power will have more/increasing right....women power? people dun get married/delayed marriaged...easy divorce with no social stigma....dun want children/cannot have children....and the trends seems to be in this direction and growing...as more and more groups fight for their immediate rights and enjoyment...soon as a specie, we will be on the road .....
Posted by kaypohts on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 16:42 PM
Next thing the politicians will insist that males must bear children i.e create artificial wombs or womb transplanted from wife into husband.

I am surprised that in this so-called advanced society IGNORING BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION IS CONSIDERED NATURAL....

The very same people who champion such unbiological nonsense is the very same people who oppose gay rights, transexual rights, lesbian rights on the grounds that it is NOT NORMAL BIOLOGICAL behaviour.

Yet these same people CAN PROCLAIM THAT IT IS NORMAL FOR HUSBANDS TO STAY HOME AND TAKE CARE OF BABIES AND WIVES CAN GO OUT AND EARN MONEY. BUT These same people would then INSIST THAT DEFENCE OF COUNTRY MUST BE HANDLED BY MALES, that females should stay away from WAR....

GUYS, if you are so stupid you deserve your fate in a FEMINIZED SINGAPORE....
Posted by cylon6 on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 15:06 PM
The writer does have a job as a copy editor with ST.Which means he still has the earning power.

Try talking to a working wife who is the sole bread winner and husband not earning anything and is the full time housemen. Unless she is the power crazy type, I am sure that she doesn't mind switching places with him.
Posted by psychodynamic on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 13:00 PM



hmmmmmm, I wonder why nature make a woman who can bear a child and has the breasts to feed the child and not the man?

I guess a woman is willing to sacrifice the bonding of a child for money or career. So typical of a career woman and when the career woman cannot get the high position, she complains about glass ceiling and boys club only.

I think the woman forgotten that those boys have mothers too.
Posted by working_class on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 11:59 AM
I have a small girl coming to 19 months, and I have been actively been taking care of her along side my wife. We are both working parents.

My view of this is that the mindset that the woman does the child bearing and child caring is nonsense maybe in barbaric times this would be correct the man goes to war, the man kills the enemy...blah, blah.

This may anger ladies or single parents out there but think this through before you hit me on the head. A complete family is a husband, wife and children. Bringing up kids should be done by both. Think on this a lady bases her thinking on feeling and therefore her intuition is absolute and girls should be brought up as such, whereas a guy should be brought up on values not feelings, as a guy's feeling tend .....
Posted by MarktheDaddy on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 10:50 AM
It's so funny that when a woman is the breadwinner the mentality of men living under the thumb of the wife crops up. Is that because that is how the men behave when they are the breadwinner, which is why they think women will do the same?

I assume you think women enjoy living under the thumb of their husbands, while enjoying being underrated by the general male population merely because they are housewives.

The thing about relationships, no matter who the breadwinner is, is to give-and-take.

Once again the stereotypical mindset has showed up, where a man's capability is judged only by his earning power and ability to suppress the potential of his wife.

Awesome.
Posted by Jezebella on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 10:24 AM
I like the ending "The writer, who is English," why do the race have to come in play. Are you trying to encourage that Dad should take over the role as Child rearing in Singapore. If you are a capable and successful man, I will guarantee you that your wife will more happy to rear the kids, go shopping and high tea with her friends and bringing the kids along. Many of my US and UK colleagues when I was working there, they told me if they have a choice, they would not like to be under the thumb, if you know what I meant.
Posted by working_class on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 09:58 AM

asiaone
Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. Regn. No. 198402868E. All rights reserved.